Showing posts with label Apologetics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apologetics. Show all posts

Thursday, May 7, 2026

Why Believe?

This week I encountered articles with somewhat different opinions about the role of apologetics in the Christian faith.

Russell Moore wrote:

When I would ask, “How did you come to Christ?” not a single [apologetics professor], to my memory, ever pointed to an apologetic argument. Often these apologists would talk about finding faith the same way I did: growing up in a good church or having parents who shared and demonstrated their faith... We need debaters, yes, and we need experts. But more than that, we face an opportunity when people all around us are exhausted by living like machines. Many of them will keep their guard up and argue confidently, but deep down they wonder, What if there is more than this? What if, behind all this, there really is someone who knows and loves me? Apologetics is a step toward showing people Jesus, but winning arguments alone is not the kingdom of God.

J. Warner Wallace wrote:

Most people [I ask] say they were raised in the faith... Others tell me their faith rests on experience—a prayer answered, a sense of God’s presence, something miraculous that confirmed Christianity to them personally. On the surface, both of these answers sound good. But neither distinguishes Christianity as true. Think about that. My Mormon family members would give identical answers about their faith. My atheist relatives also cite upbringing and experience to justify their worldview...

We live in a culture that elevates private experience and personal truth. But the God of Scripture doesn’t ask us to believe blindly or feel our way toward Him. He calls us to examine the evidence He’s provided—to love Him not only with our hearts but with our minds. That’s why every believer must become a Christian case maker.

Moore grew up in the church and relies more heavily on the relational aspects of Christianity. Wallace came to faith as an adult after investigating the claims for himself. Both are good paths, and both are needed in our culture. All believers should have a testimony of how God has worked and continues to work in their lives, but I don’t think we can stop there. In a culture that says, “You have your truth and I have mine,” a personal testimony doesn’t necessarily give anyone else a reason to believe Christianity is true. The average church member probably wouldn’t know where to begin in defending their faith rationally, and there are limits to what can be taught in an hour or two on Sundays. That may be an area where we all need to grow.

In my own case, I began to believe at a very young age because I grew up in the church and a family with multiple generations of pastors. However, I didn’t really know what I believed until college and seminary. Though I knew the distinctive beliefs of the denomination my parents had grown up in, I didn’t really know the essentials of Christianity. Moving frequently, the churches of various denominations that we attended never told me about God’s great love and grace. Nor did they tell me why Christianity made sense logically. All I remember hearing was that God exists and that He expects us to live a certain way in order to be saved.

In college, I had great professors who made sense of Scripture, history, and science. But I also had a discipler who loved me and showed me that God was more than a Creator and Judge. I needed both mind and heart perspectives to tell me that Christianity was worth holding onto. If I had not gone to a Christian college, I think it’s likely that I would have walked away from the church, and perhaps from faith, when life got hard. And if I had not had that discipler, I think I would have given up on life entirely.

Is reason more important than relationship or vice versa? The two can’t really be separated, though different times of life may require different approaches. We need both truth and love to fully experience the life-changing reality of faith in Christ Jesus—

“So that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into Him who is the head, into Christ” (Eph. 4:14-15).

© 2026 Dawn Rutan. Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture are ESV and all images copyright free from pixabay.com. The opinions stated do not necessarily reflect the views of my church or employer.

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

National Conference on Christian Apologetics


Here are a few brief notes and links from some of the sessions I attended at the National Conference on Christian Apologetics. I chose several sessions related to biology because that is what my first degree was in and I still enjoy it. It was an encouraging and educational time.

1) God’s Crime Scene: Evidence for God’s Existence from the Fine-Tuning of the Universe- J. Warner Wallace (Cold Case Christianity)
Can the finely tuned systems of our universe be explained by something within the universe? No, there are far too many variables for chance to have created the universe as we know it. There had to have been an outside force that was both purposeful and powerful. The existence of morality implies that the force was also personal. The answer to our questions is not a “what” but a “Who.”

2) The Age of the Earth: A Charitable Approach- Eric Gustafson (Southern Evangelical Seminary)
Though there are many areas for disagreement, old earth and young earth Christians should be able to agree on these points:
a) Biblical interpretation- Creation passages are historical rather than metaphorical, though not scientifically precise.
b) Scriptural genealogies refer to real people in real history, but are not necessarily comprehensive (ie. generations may have been skipped). Genealogies are not intended to provide exact details but key people.
c) Death before the Fall- Only humans are endowed with a spiritual nature. No humans died before the Fall; however, animals were most likely mortal from creation.
d) Presuppositionalism- Can non-believers correctly interpret general revelation? God’s general revelation properly interpreted will never contradict His special revelation properly interpreted.

3) It’s Time to Do Biology as if Darwin Had Never Been Born- Randy Guliuzza (Institute for Creation Research)
Darwin essentially said that changes in environments cause changes in organisms, thereby making adaptation externalistic. He said that the changes in organisms were copious, small, undirected mutations over long periods of time. However, ongoing research disproves that theory. A single species without any changes in DNA can adapt different characteristics based on how it senses its own environment through Continuous Environmental Tracking. These changes can take place within a single generation and are predictable, not just genetic drift and survival of the fittest.

4) The God Who Wants Us to Test Him: Testing Genesis with the Latest Science- Hugh Ross (Reasons to Believe)
From an old earth perspective, scientific research continues to reveal that the order of events in nature corresponds with the order as outlined in the Bible in Genesis 1 and Job 37-39. Previously assumed disparities have been disproved. For example:
  • Vegetation fossils have been found which prove that plants existed before animals.
  • Fossils continue to show no transition species.
  • Continents emerged more quickly than originally believed.
  • Genetic diversity of closed populations increase faster than predicted, so we could have all come from two original humans.
The more we learn about science, the more reasons we have to believe the Bible.


© 2018 Dawn Rutan. Unless otherwise indicated all images are copyright free from pixabay.com. The opinions stated do not necessarily reflect the views of my church or employer.